You're dodging. You have little, other than a contrarian nature, to support what you're saying.
You say 'evolution' supposedly has allowed our mind to evolve to the point that we dominate all other species. We have apparently reached our zenith, or so it seems that you imply. So what does this say about the tiny bacteria, or the virus (for which there are no cures)? If the mind has 'evolved' to a point of superiority over all things, why then are these tiny microorganisms still the only known natural enemy and predator of man? And we are no closer to having 'superiority' over them than we have ever been.
Perhaps they have been 'evolved' to be our superiors? Evolutionary 'proofs' and 'arguments' are amazingly odd.
I imply no such thing.
So what does this say about the tiny bacteria, or the virus (for which there are no cures)?
Are you alluding to the bacteria mutations?
If the mind has 'evolved' to a point of superiority over all things, why then are these tiny microorganisms still the only known natural enemy and predator of man? And we are no closer to having 'superiority' over them than we have ever been.
Makers of various drugs would disagree.