I assume that's a snide comment. So here's my response, it's a shame that there is no open dialog with Evolutionists. They have made up their mind and defend their belief more intensely than most Creationists I've spoken with. Every little scrap of information that comes along they hold up to say, "See! There is no G--. We're all just an accident!!" And when that information is later debunked (as a great deal of it is eventually), you conveniently ignore that.
So, if you think I've 'finally learned something,' I'd have to say it's a shame that you and the other Evolutionist on this thread are incapable of opening your eyes past your petri dish. I continue to investigate and to learn, because I have solid faith in G-- and science and its theories are of no threat to me. And if I err and foolishly put science in front of my G--, he'll forgive me. But if the Evolutionist does not believe in G--, well that would go a long way toward explaining their desperate attempt to prove that Evolution as leading back to an original life form that was an accident.
An evolutionist can believe in God. A creationist cannot believe in evolution. Who has the open mind?
I guess that "open mind" is displayed in one of your earlier posts when someone tried to educate you with the facts.
Pure fabrication. But hey, if you gotta make stuff up to support your view...