Posted on 11/16/2004 2:42:43 PM PST by dinok
The Losertarians in WA may have cost Dino Rossi the governorship. When are they going to get a clue?
A sign from Airplane II that begins with "Unbelievable" ought to be flashing through everybody's mind right about now.
Cool! President Bush gets to win again.
So why don't they recount Michigan? There were obvious problem with the count here .
There's but a couple-letter difference between Liebertarian and Lieberal.
Whoa, they are going to certify and THEN recount??
And then let's have an investigation of vote fraud and count fraud in Detroit. Alright?
I have libertarian tendencies, but was completely turned off for good when I saw a debate Badaranik(sp?) participated in with other 3rd party candidates as Columbia U (Oct. I think it was) and he OUTRIGHT stated the democrat LIE about W starting the draft. Any thoughts I may have entertained about voting and/or supporting libertarian causes and candidates with money, time, etc.--the door is shut on that for good. This cute little OH stunt by them only reinforces my thoughts about them.
Florida law mandated a recount because of the closeness of the election.
Hope the taxpayers of Ohio enjoy picking up the tab for this political pandering.
I'm convinced that's what it is, the Green Party smells blood in the water from the wounded Dems and is hoping to peel away some of the Dems so to make themselves more "relevant".
Ok, so wait. The recount occurs after the election has been certified?? Then what's the point? Question: So what would happen in the unlikely case that the recount showed Kerry winning after all? Nothing? It's left up to Ohio's legislature? Contested slate? Goes to the House?
This is actually rather fascinating. I don't think it's likely mind you (rather: I don't think it's possible, without outright fraud on whoever does the "re-counting"...), but I do wonder how it would play out if a post-certification recount showed the result changing.....
And Philly.
Not here in Washington state.
After certification? Why wouldn't they want to do it beforehand? Oh well. Nothing is going to change anyway.
All the Ohio updates right here: http://mytwocommoncents.blogspot.com/
Or Wisconsin (then again, they would have to pay for the entire cost). Then again, if Wisconsin had gone to Bush and be the deciding state, they'd pony up the dough.
I'm in total agreement with you.
Why don't they recount Pennsylvania?
The lie that Ohio decided the election is prevalent and misleading.
Ohio didn't decide the election any more than Pennsylvania would decide the election...why not make sure the votes in PA are counted properly (the difference is smaller than the OH difference) and who knows, Bush may have won PA too, if ALL the VOTES are COUNTED!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.