Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nothernlights
IT is if he is in breach of imbed rules and thereby endangers the life of military personel.

Please show the rules in question.

Please explain how this endangers the lives of military personnel.

77 posted on 11/16/2004 5:54:04 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah

Once again the point is that "you "do not know the rules of imbed. But I am sure there is vetting of material involved by military. So stop acting like you know everything. You actually know on more then anybody else and you sre too close minded to reflect for 1 minute that maybe Sites himself was in breach of some rules.


81 posted on 11/16/2004 6:05:52 PM PST by nothernlights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah

We seem to have gotten away from the original thread here....

What were Sites' ROE (Rules of Embedding), and where is he tonight?

My email to the Commandant and my congressman stated that Sites should be removed from the field of battle pending investigation of his ROE. He gave the video first to a foreign news service (Reuters) and did not pass same on to the DOD for investigation.
Faces and nametapes of our Marines were clearly visible on the Arab TV broadcasts, proving that he took no effort to protect the identities of the Marines pending investigation.

Was this legal under his agreement with the DOD?


87 posted on 11/16/2004 6:18:01 PM PST by surfatsixty (Proud Father of a USMC Grunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson