He sure behaved like a Judas didn't he? He certainly is doing the leg work for our Islamofascist enemies -- giving good film footage to Al Jazeera,et. al, giving good anecdotal support to the moulahs as they incite the mobs for the deaths of our troopers. Of course, there are those who wont believe it until you run down to your local law library and look up the applicable case law that pertains to treason. The rest of us can use common sense.
Please cite specific law to support your case.
Arguing that he's a "Judas" because his reporting displeases you--that it showed an ugly side of war that disturbs you--isn't sufficient.
He certainly is doing the leg work for our Islamofascist enemies -- giving good film footage to Al Jazeera,et. al, giving good anecdotal support to the moulahs as they incite the mobs for the deaths of our troopers.
My guess: it's more likely to show the likely recruiting pool "hey, kids, go shooting at Americans, they're not likely to be happy."
Of course, there are those who wont believe it until you run down to your local law library and look up the applicable case law that pertains to treason. The rest of us can use common sense.
If you are arguing that Sites committed treason, you had better be arguing the law, because the law is king here. Treason is the only crime specifically identified in the Constitution, and the standard is extremely high for a very good reason.