Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: weegee; TalBlack; michaelbfree
8 “The 'insurgents' are terrorists and therefore not bound [protected?] by the Geneva Conventions.”

Based on what we know so far, I think the Marine did the right thing, BUT...

It is incorrect to state that the Geneva Conventions do not apply to a non-signatory (the "insurgents"). Since the U.S. is a signatory, the GC's bind us to observe them during a conflict with a non-signatory.

However, it can be reasonably argued that there are other reasons the GC does not apply to these illegal combatants.

--Boot Hill

416 posted on 11/15/2004 6:21:54 PM PST by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: Dog
ping to 416

--Boot

419 posted on 11/15/2004 6:22:42 PM PST by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies ]

To: Boot Hill

In general, I don't think the terrorists in Fallujah qualify as illegal combatants if they carry their arms openly.


422 posted on 11/15/2004 6:23:24 PM PST by sullivan-fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies ]

To: Boot Hill

I meant that NO ONE is trying to demonize the "insurgents" for violating the Geneva Conventions by torturing and murdering civilian prisoners kidnapped off the street.

OUR SIDE is being held to a double standard in this war.


554 posted on 11/15/2004 8:46:53 PM PST by weegee (WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson