First you ask for a source, then when it's provided, you ask for a "verification source". It's never ending. You will never be placated because you still haven't told the real reason you oppose the nrst.Talk about straw men. I've only asked for a paper that verifies Jorgenson's claim. We've all been aware of Jorgenson's paper for a long time. Why would I ask for it? I have several versions on my hard drive and in print.
Indeed.
You used to ask for sources one of which Jorgenson became. Then you ask for sources to the sources.
Why not just tell the real reason you oppose?
"Talk about straw men. I've only asked for a paper that verifies Jorgenson's claim. We've all been aware of Jorgenson's paper for a long time. Why would I ask for it? I have several versions on my hard drive and in print."
How many economic studies have you provided to support your desired approach to tax reform?