We have established the fact that one of the planks of the party is pro-life; but you simply cannot say that 60 million people went to the polls because of pro-life issues.
Hey that plank might as well not be there, is what you're telling us. Sorry, won't wash. The "non pro life" GOP voters have no excuse for not knowing it was there.
FINALLY, you've offered a sound assertion that even I will heartily agree with! WOW! [Now, to make my ears ring, perhaps Hildy will asseret that she is against abortion for any reason except LIFE of the mother, rape and incest. Nah, can't happen!]
No, I never said that 60 million "went to the polls because of pro-life issues." I know that I voted pro-life (and that I campaigned for the President on that point), and believe that a large number, if not a majority, of those 60 million are prolife.
If a blatant error such as the one Specter made last week is ignored, and because of that error, we get more of the same (i.e., "Scottish law defence," "Roe is the law of the land") when he can effect the outcome, our Party is not using its power effectively. Our elected representatives cannot expect to gain or maintain support from the voters if they support unwise politicians who can't be quiet for a couple of weeks.
I'm sure that your vote would not be affected if the Republican Party managed to overcome Roe, would it?