Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ken5050; Everybody
Ken writes:

.. Assume that W gets to put three conservative judges on the SC tomorrow..all of whom are staunchly pro-life. Roe would be overturned..

Not if those new judges honored their oaths to support the Constitution. And once sworn, they probably would.

but not on moral grounds, that abortion is a crime...rather that Roes was bad law..finding a "right" that didn't exist in the Constitution..

"Due process" is a well established Constitutional right. It even applies to pregnant women, believe it or not.

and it would sent the question of abortion back to the several states, for the legistatures to decide..

The legislators in States can not Constitutionally infringe upon an individuals right to due process, -- any more than they can on our RKBA's.

The sad fact that States are indeed so infringing, -- only shows how corrupt our whole political system has become.

311 posted on 11/13/2004 9:54:11 AM PST by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine

Do you agree with the Constitutional Amendment move (or jive) stipulating marriage between one (1) man and one (1) woman?


425 posted on 11/13/2004 10:48:28 AM PST by ApesForEvolution ("We trust [RINO-BORKING-ABORTER] Sen. Arlen spRectum's word" - "IF spRectum gets the Chair, IF")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson