Michael Barone was right in 2000; he was right in 2002; and I'm willing to bet he's right in 2004.
You may call him flawed because it doesn't jive with your agenda, but you do so at the risk of undercutting your argument.
Michael Barone is one of the most respected political "statisticians" in this day and age.
Go ahead then, marginalize your FRiends, act on very suspect polling (btw, I'm sure Mr. Barone would tell you that, statistically speaking, his past performance means nothing wrt his future abilities - he'd also tell you polling is changing as is the demography) and go left on life, if that is what you advocate. Me, my house, we will follow Our Lord. If the GOP earns our vote, they will get it. If they betray their stated principles, they lose. Ask Geo. Nethercutt what happens when you betray your base.
"Michael Barone is one of the most respected political "statisticians" in this day and age."
AND he's Pro-Life to boot! Good guy, that Michael is.