[cpforlife.org]

I was quoting HIS posts illustrating his hypocracy. How would that prove his point?

I thought I was clear. Was it not?

[Cold Heat]

He took offense to what you posted as much or more than how it was said.

This entire thread has been a continuous flamer. He was correct, and you did take the time to review his posting history and find some hyperbole to toss back at him.

I sure would not have done that.

But what the hell do I know about civility.

[A Jovial Cad]

*I was quoting HIS posts illustrating his hypocracy*

LOL...what a deal..."quoting" my "posts" in order to "illustrate" what? My "hypocracy"? LOL...what's a "hypo" and how can it be a part of a "cracy"?

No, here's the REAL DEAL: you couldn't answer a simple question, so, like most those without a coherent answer to a straightforward question, you went trolling...just like a typical leftist. There was not the LEAST bit of "hypocrisy" (FR provides a spell check, BTW, before posting; it might behoove you to use it) in any past post of mine and the ones I put forward for public consumption tonight: NOT ONE SPECK OF IT. I didn't use the language I condemned in this thread in ANY of those "examples" from my past posts you provided--as you well know. But what you counted on is something someone on the losing side of a debate should NEVER count on: you rolled the dice and hoped I wouldn't refute the nonsense, in detail, as I have. My friend, I'm tireless when it comes to bait-and-switcher's such as yourself who try to "debate" in such a scummy manner: I'll match you post for post, reply for reply, until the Sun rises in the West or until the thread is yanked, either/or. Because, though I don't mind disagreement, I DO mind subtle deception employed on behalf of an argument, as you've done here. To read your "reply" to me--without checking every thread you posted from your "research"--implies that I used the same language I've condemned in this thread, and that is exactly what you intended. It's nonsense, of course: I used no such language in any of those "examples" you provided, and have never in any FR thread anywhere in my time here. So this "illustrating his hypocracy[Sic]" nonsense is exactly that: NONSENSE.
'Tis passing strange that a so-called "Christian" doesn't even have the moral decency to debate honestly...mighty strange indeed.