Dear Cold Heat,
"Sure, the appeals courts are brimming over with challenges. These challenges are normal and have yet to work their way though."
Plenty of challenges have already made their way to the Supreme Court.
Some very minor forms of regulation of abortion (parental notification with judicial bypass, minor waiting periods, and informed consent come to mind) have been permitted.
No real restriction of abortion has been permitted.
Including Nebraska's ban on partial birth abortion. Ruled not allowable under Roe.
But, wait, northward of 70% of folks want a ban on partial birth abortion! How can that be?? Huge majorities of folks want something not permitted under Roe!! How is that possible??
LOL.
As for activist judges, if we wanted activist judges, we'd want folks who would go beyond overturning Roe to enunciating that abortion itself is a constitutional violation, and must be banned forthwith.
But that is not what we seek. We seek that judges will read themselves OUT of the debate, and turn the matter back over to the political process, the legislative process.
Why do you fear that result? Afraid that people might support more restrictions than you'd like?
sitetest
I fear judicial activists of any color, stripe or political party affiliation.
They have no business on the bench.
PERIOD!!!!!!!END OF STATEMENT!