I'm betting guilty. The jury deadlocked because of the two wack jurors. Once they were removed, the jury decided quickly. It's gotta be 'guilty'.
I'm guessing not guilty. I think someone who does outside research is looking for ways to convict, not the reverse. With that roadblock gone they brought it to conclusion. I suspect he did it, but I doubt the case is beyond reasonable doubt. We'll see soon.
Actually.. The more and more I think about it, the more and more I think that your theory is right.
I have thought this entire time that those two jurors were voting Guilty and the rest of them were overthrowing them.. But after thinking about the type of case that was made, I am leaning against that possibility.
The foreman who was tossed was a doctor/lawyer. I can picture this guy being a lone voice in the deliberation room, "There is no burden of proof! There is no burden of proof!" over and over and over again and the jury getting sick of his "braniacs".
I was thinking he would be found not guilty the entire time, but now I'm not sure.
"I'm betting guilty. The jury deadlocked because of the two wack jurors. Once they were removed, the jury decided quickly. It's gotta be 'guilty'."
I'm with you on this.