To: GreenAccord
Yeah, poor choice of words on my part. Doesn't change the overall meaning though. They found what they needed within the legal definition, and did what they had to do.
1,235 posted on
11/12/2004 1:38:12 PM PST by
Jokelahoma
(Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
To: Jokelahoma
Could you please tell me what they found? I mean from a legal standpoint? Whether he's guilty or not, they convicted on assumptions. Doesn't that scare anyone on this thread? It scares the hell out of me. And I'm a totally law abiding citizen. He's a creep as far as cheating on his wife and lying to her, but that doesn't make him a murderer.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson