To: WildTurkey
On the grounds of a jury deliberating for days, 2 jurors tossed out, then an almost immediate verdict..THIS STINKS EVERY BIT AS MUCH AS THE O.J. VERDICT!
1,022 posted on
11/12/2004 1:22:26 PM PST by
BOOTSTICK
(meet me in Kansas city)
To: BOOTSTICK
Yeah, there's just something not right with the tossing of jurors. It's almost as if the judge was tossing anyone that wanted to find Scott not-guilty.
To: BOOTSTICK
They would likely have returned a verdict Tuesday had they not dismissed the first juror, perhaps Wednesday had they not had the foreman dismissed. If the preponderance of evidence points toward guilt, there's no need for the jury to deliberate for days on end. They were convinced he was guilty, they said so, end of story.
1,072 posted on
11/12/2004 1:25:20 PM PST by
Jokelahoma
(Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson