Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez

rather ambiguous standards,>>

you hit the nail on the head.

It's all arbitrary, if he were pro life he would have sided with Priscella Owen, who obviously isn't a good judge since Gonzales did the right thing according to you.

Hey, you can't have it both ways either Gonzales was right and Owen wrong or the other way around.

So, the minor is now an adult, who aborted her living child and will most likely suffer lifelong depression, possibly suicide and an increase risk of getting breast cancer! Way to go Gonzales.

Who knows maybe she's now sterile too.


469 posted on 11/12/2004 8:00:15 PM PST by Coleus (Abortion and Euthanasia, Don't Democrats just kill ya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies ]


To: Coleus

WRONG!

Jane Doe met the criteria as the law was written!

She was mature (age of consent in Texas is 17), and she was sufficiently well informed about the repercussions of her decision.

I don't want a Judge slanting his opinion based on his feelings from either side of this issue!


472 posted on 11/12/2004 8:03:25 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
"Hey, you can't have it both ways either Gonzales was right and Owen wrong or the other way around."

What the hell are you babbling about "have it both ways"?

Owen was wrong in this case.

473 posted on 11/12/2004 8:04:55 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson