tame: of COURSE. a judge ruling against ANY unconstitutional ruling is acting correctly. Now the appeals courts, SCOTUS, etc., won't let him have his way.
But that hardly abrogates HIS responsibility to do what is correct, and it hardly means HE's the one who is wrong.
stuartcr: I disagree. Please show me where that is spelled out in the Constitution, etc.?
My point was simply that a judge has a responsibility to interpret and apply the Constitution correctly in his rulings, regardless of what other judges may do.
You then wrote that you disagree!
Are you actually arguing that he should NOT?!? Please show me where THAT is spelled out in the Constitution.
The burden of proof rests with you to show that a judge SHOULD MISinterpret the constitution. a Peculiar position, to say the least.
Why are you writing things that make it appear that I said it?
That is not very honest...I did not write any of which you are attaching my name to.