Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coleus
Me too. Was there a parental notification law in effect in Texas when he made the decision to NOT let the parent's know about this girl getting an abortion?

Yes. Said law included a provision for bypassing said notification requirement in specific circumstances.

If there were a law in effect, he DID legislate from the bench.

Actually, he didn't. The lower court interpreted the law in a way that was not consonant with the legislature's intent.

258 posted on 11/12/2004 12:52:23 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah

Yes. Said law included a provision for bypassing said notification requirement in specific circumstances. >>>

This is kind of vague. I wonder what the compelling circumstance was? In her case and what's listed in the law. See, laws like this opens up a back door for judges to kill babies and the like, in NJ a 3 strikes and your out law was passed with a back door for the judge to overrule and decide. Guess what? Not one person was ever convicted.

If I'm not mistaken, Gov. Bush appointed pro aborts to the TX supreme court and named a highway after a pro-abort politician.

I know for a FACT, that President Bush did appoint 6 pro-aborts to the federal judiciary in New Jersey. Is he afraid of the skeleton Sen. Frank Lautenberg?


264 posted on 11/12/2004 1:00:06 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson