[Ol' Sparky]

Obviously, two lower courts disagreed with the Texas Supreme Court on how determine what constituted a judicial bypass. So, the courts ended up deciding the standard, as often happens.

Gonzalez and friends overturned the lower courts intrepretation of judicial bypass and opposed a lower standard than the lower courts.

[deport]

Gonzalez and friends overturned the lower courts intrepretation of judicial bypass and opposed a lower standard than the lower courts.

---

Well did the lower and appellate courts raise bar..... that's what the opinion is basically stating.... So again I ask for the wording which supports your contention.... not the fact that the lower and appellate court got over turned. The 6-3 ruling said that the 17 year old met the requirements as enumerated in the PNA.... Did one over reach or the did one lower the bar?

[Scholastic]

Of course, allowing the 17 year old girl to kill a child under cover of law conflicts with the 14th amemdment, which demands equal protection under the law for all "persons" is each state (including Texas). An unborn child is indeed a "person."