Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stuartcr

The difference is that legislating from the bench got us Abortion on demand. the people calling for judges that would rule "morally" is exactly what started this mess in the first place. the lefties thought it was "moral" to kill the unborn if it inconvienenced the Mother. Now the same people that devried this standard are calling on Bush to name judges and AG's that will flush the constitution. For Years we have been trying to get constitutionalist judges on the bench. We know there is no right to an Abortion in the constitution. Yet some of the comments here are making me think some of us have lost our way.


144 posted on 11/12/2004 10:42:34 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: marty60
The difference is that legislating from the bench got us Abortion on demand. the people calling for judges that would rule "morally" is exactly what started this mess in the first place. the lefties thought it was "moral" to kill the unborn if it inconvienenced the Mother.

The difference is that we're right and they're wrong. Abortion is intrinsically evil. All laws that uphold abortion are intrinsically evil and therefore null.

156 posted on 11/12/2004 10:56:11 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

To: marty60

So the supreme court should never rule on a states constitution?


162 posted on 11/12/2004 11:03:50 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson