Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons

You still make no sense. You condemn a woman for ACCIDENTLY becoming pregnant(And you are COMPLETELY wrong, there is a lot of evidence of fallopian tubes healing up)who is keeping her babies and is planning to raise them with the babies' father, yet you think it is fine for a 57 year old to have babies ON PURPOSE WITHOUT a father.


141 posted on 11/12/2004 8:23:05 PM PST by Politicalmom ( Since Bush was selected in 2000, shouldn't he be able to run again in 2008?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: Politicalmom

Doctors actually tell you that this is a possibility. I think the lady is just in awe that this is happening to her but her and hubby are going to take care of the kids.

I think in Nopardons world you must be rich and from the city to be acceptable. But then we must remember, maybe we did not fully comprehend the real meaning of the posts(ha ha) not!!


142 posted on 11/12/2004 8:32:17 PM PST by rave123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

To: Politicalmom
It appears that there are far too many people on this thread,who are in desperate need of reading comprehension classes!

I haven't "condemned" anyone.It is rare for fallopian tubes to regenerate.It is strange,peculiar,even eyebrow raising for people to divorce and still have sexual relations;not to mention off putting.And I never claimed that a 59 year old divorcee having twins via IVF was "fine".

I make far more sense than YOU ever shall. LOL

143 posted on 11/12/2004 8:33:15 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson