Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArGee

Well, you understand what I mean. The pro-abortionists always resort to the "rape, incest, or when the mother's life is in danger" canard when defending abortion. Funny thing is, that these incidents are miniscule.


74 posted on 11/11/2004 1:54:26 PM PST by ServesURight (Tim Michels for U.S. Senate Wisconsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: ServesURight
Well, you understand what I mean. The pro-abortionists always resort to the "rape, incest, or when the mother's life is in danger" canard when defending abortion. Funny thing is, that these incidents are miniscule.

Yep, and it's a transparent attempt to short-circuit the argument. Generally the pro-lifer will say that those are not reasons to abort the child, and the pro-abort will respond by endlessly calling the person an extremist nut.

Better to just cede that part of the argument and concentrate on the other 99%, or else the pro-abort will never let you get past arguing the exception.

76 posted on 11/11/2004 1:56:36 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: ServesURight
Well, you understand what I mean.

I quite well understand. You are correct that it is a canard. The entire abortion thing winds down to a woman tossing her instinct to love and nurture her child in favor of making her own life easier. We dehumanize mothers, then wonder why they raise little monsters.

Go figure.

Shalom.

83 posted on 11/11/2004 2:07:27 PM PST by ArGee (After 517, the abolition of man is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson