Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
OK, let's take your claim about your acquaintances at face value. A few cases of jury nullification back in the late 80s led to a policiy of non-enforcement against employers since then.

How would that change if the Bush proposal passes?

612 posted on 11/10/2004 6:47:54 PM PST by Fatalis (John Kyl in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies ]


To: Fatalis
OK, let's take your claim about your acquaintances at face value. A few cases of jury nullification back in the late 80s led to a policiy of non-enforcement against employers since then.

How would that change if the Bush proposal passes?

It brings the law into closer accord with the customs of the American Southwest regarding hiring of Mexican workers.

It was perfectly legal to hire Mexicans until 1965. And then the rules were arbitrarily changed to benefit one small special-interest group.

In 1994, the rules regarding firearms were changed to benefit one small interest group. We got outraged about it.

In 2001, the rules regarding political speech were changed to benefit one small interest group. We got outraged about it.

When the law violates long-standing (and harmless to others) custom, there's a case (which I don't subscribe to) that said law should be violated.

Laws regarding discretionary behavior (i.e., behavior that does not injure others) that are in accord with accepted social norms are more likely to be obeyed, and are a hell of a lot easier to enforce, because violations will be viewed by jurors as being more serious violations of the social compact.

617 posted on 11/10/2004 6:54:07 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson