To: FreedomCalls
"That was the case with Wal-Mart."
Unfortunately you are incorrect. The employer of the illegals was a subcontractor for Walmart. Walmart was guilty of not checking the I-9's of it's subcontractor's illegal employees.
450 posted on
11/10/2004 4:40:21 PM PST by
politicalwit
(They want your vote... but not your voice.)
To: politicalwit
The employer of the illegals was a subcontractor for Walmart. Walmart was guilty of not checking the I-9's of it's subcontractor's illegal employees. Wal Mart is an innocent party when they've been busted before? Can you say plausible deniability?
455 posted on
11/10/2004 4:43:00 PM PST by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2008)
To: politicalwit
The employer of the illegals was a subcontractor for Walmart. But the subcontractor paid all the payroll taxes, SS taxes, and unemployment taxes. They weren't "off the books" paid with an envelope of cash under the table.
560 posted on
11/10/2004 6:13:44 PM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson