Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

Well why don't you just fill us in on what is not true here. It seems word for word with what Bush proposed in his first year until 9/11 forced him to withdraw his guest worker/amnesty. Redefining illegality does not make it right. Who believes that after three years in the US and with the anchor babies that will surely result that anyone will be returning to Mexico or anywhere else. Or is supporting Bush all you care about?


119 posted on 11/10/2004 1:50:18 PM PST by ACDSWIZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: ACDSWIZ
Who believes that after three years in the US and with the anchor babies that will surely result that anyone will be returning to Mexico or anywhere else.

These people must be in a drug induced dreamworld. There will be no damn enforcement of anything!

124 posted on 11/10/2004 1:53:41 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: ACDSWIZ

"Who believes that after three years in the US and with the anchor babies that will surely result that anyone will be returning to Mexico or anywhere else. "

I would hope that any new immigration plan would include a provision that denies automatic citizenship to the babies born here of non-citizen parents.


129 posted on 11/10/2004 1:54:17 PM PST by fetts (Silence in the face of evil is appeasement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: ACDSWIZ
Well why don't you just fill us in on what is not true here.

Bush said no blanket amnesty; he says what he means and means what he says, or haven't you been paying attention?

It seems word for word with what Bush proposed in his first year until 9/11 forced him to withdraw his guest worker/amnesty.

Bush submitted his "plan" in January of 2003 and never said another word about it; it's called putting it out there for discussion; he didn't submit a bill, did he? There are plenty other bills up there that are just sitting there, too. Or did you notice that?

Redefining illegality does not make it right.

The only people redefining anything are those of you who wish to make ANY DISCUSSION of anything short of shotting them all at the border unacceptable;

Who believes that after three years in the US and with the anchor babies that will surely result that anyone will be returning to Mexico or anywhere else.

Or is supporting Bush all you care about?

Since you've only been here 8 days and would have no way of knowing who or what I support (if you're not a retread), I will assume that you use that taunt to reply to anybody who disagrees with you. Quite weak, IMO.

And I will stand with George W. Bush; at least he's trying to do SOMETHING about it, besides bitch and moan.

132 posted on 11/10/2004 1:55:37 PM PST by Howlin (I love the smell of mandate in the morning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson