Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crushelits

I don't think the jury told the judge that they won't be able to reach a verdict. On courttv they said they think the judge may have been told that one of the jurors doesn't want to participate in the deliberation process. Maybe it's the juror that never takes notes, picks his nails and doesn't listen? Then the judge read an instruction on their duties as jurors.


40 posted on 11/08/2004 12:12:18 PM PST by snowstorm12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: snowstorm12
From what I heard, that one juror, the fireman, had an attitude problem. I wonder if he is the one who refuses to deliberate.

In any case the prosecutors sure proved beyond a resonable doubt (some here apparently expect beyond any doubt -- which is absurd) and did a good job. There is the timeline and there is the place where Scott went "fishing."

43 posted on 11/08/2004 12:17:19 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson