Posted on 11/08/2004 6:55:26 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
"Being a liberal" became bad when U. S. liberals started
following the Communist Pary of America agenda word for word!
9) Here's some koolaid.
Exactly!!
"So as a Southerner"
So as a Southern Indian, that is.
"We just have to connect the Democratic agenda to notions of morality, family and God"
In your case, Amit, that would be Gods, would it not?
YUP. Feminism and gay rights.
....ability to filibuster Bush’s judicial nominations, and we can all say good-bye to affirmative action, a woman’s right to choose and the separation between church and state.
A woman’s right to choose kill an unborn child. (say what it is, and don't hide this with the "chose" word.)
Liberals win on the issues
There is that "L" word.
I’ve been so annoyed by those who critique Tom Daschle, say Michael Moore’s a radical and try to sound smart by saying they’re fiscal conservatives.....It’s time we quit criticizing our own in public.
That's it. Eat your own.
Dumb it down and get dirty. That means running negative campaign ads
Like you haven't done that for the past few elections against the Republicans.
The Republicans took our legitimate disdain for Bush and convinced the American public that we were all just hateful people.
DUH!!!!! I haven't seen the likes of hate in any election before this one.
Be proud of being a liberal. .... “When did being liberal become so bad?”....Don’t run away from the liberal title like Kerry did; be unapologetic and flaunt it.
YUP... That is the ticket you need to run on for every election.
Liberals will continue to lose if they look weak on defense and have members that keep sporting those silly “war is not the answer” bumper stickers.
With all the crybabies on the left, you will never be able to quit the anti-war, anti-Republican, global warming, EV whacko, Pro tree/anti-Bush, etc., bumper stickers.
Let's stop calling them liberals. They are lots of things, but liberal is not one of them.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Amit Patel
Position: Columnist
Email Address: induz@stanford.edu
The author manages to get all the way through an article on being a liberal without once mentioning what liberal principles really are.
I think there are not any.
If lefties take all that advice, we're sure to win another election.
Hmmm... Seems to me "gay rights" and other forms of hedonism stood the Greek and Roman empires well, now didn't it?
For those DEMOCRATS who feel their party is being mis-identified, let me ask this.
Just exactly what would you say is a defining principle of DEMOCRATS? WHAT DO YOU STAND FOR?
I have yet to see or hear anyone list out the basic principles that one should support in being a DEMOCRAT.
All I ever heard was that the poor, the blacks, the average blue collar worker were all DEMOCRATS from BIRTH, without any choice. Democrats don't ask "WHY AM I A DEMOCRAT".
THe real WHY is that the blacks, the poor, women,blue collar workers were considered VERY LARGE VOTING BLOCKS, so ORGANIZED CRIME infiltrated the DEM party and the MEDIA to use them politically for evil ends. It's really all that simple.
Most of the whiners were complaining that they lost DEMOCRACY in this country.
"This country is no longer a DEMOCRACY."
Well, my friends, IT NEVER WAS. These people ignored history, ignore the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, except when they can find an interpretation that allows them to bend the law.
The prove it by their discussion of their 'rights'.
They have no clue, only what some news article tells them, or some chump down the street.
For those DEMOCRATS who feel their party is being mis-identified, let me ask this.
Just exactly what would you say is a defining principle of DEMOCRATS? WHAT DO YOU STAND FOR?
I have yet to see or hear anyone list out the basic principles that one should support in being a DEMOCRAT.
All I ever heard was that the poor, the blacks, the average blue collar worker were all DEMOCRATS from BIRTH, without any choice. Democrats don't ask "WHY AM I A DEMOCRAT".
THe real WHY is that the blacks, the poor, women,blue collar workers were considered VERY LARGE VOTING BLOCKS, so ORGANIZED CRIME infiltrated the DEM party and the MEDIA to use them politically for evil ends. It's really all that simple.
Most of the whiners were complaining that they lost DEMOCRACY in this country.
"This country is no longer a DEMOCRACY."
Well, my friends, IT NEVER WAS. These people ignored history, ignore the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, except when they can find an interpretation that allows them to bend the law.
The prove it by their discussion of their 'rights'.
They have no clue, only what some news article tells them, or some chump down the street.
For those DEMOCRATS who feel their party is being mis-identified, let me ask this.
Just exactly what would you say is a defining principle of DEMOCRATS? WHAT DO YOU STAND FOR?
I have yet to see or hear anyone list out the basic principles that one should support in being a DEMOCRAT.
All I ever heard was that the poor, the blacks, the average blue collar worker were all DEMOCRATS from BIRTH, without any choice. Democrats don't ask "WHY AM I A DEMOCRAT".
THe real WHY is that the blacks, the poor, women,blue collar workers were considered VERY LARGE VOTING BLOCKS, so ORGANIZED CRIME infiltrated the DEM party and the MEDIA to use them politically for evil ends. It's really all that simple.
Most of the whiners were complaining that they lost DEMOCRACY in this country.
"This country is no longer a DEMOCRACY."
Well, my friends, IT NEVER WAS. These people ignored history, ignore the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, except when they can find an interpretation that allows them to bend the law.
The prove it by their discussion of their 'rights'.
They have no clue, only what some news article tells them, or some chump down the street.
Can't answer that one, nor could John Kerry which is why he lost.
But I believe the democrat party of today is radically different than the democrat party of the 50's and 60's. The DNC has been corrupted by hardcore single-issue liberal special interest groups that when "defined" as a set of principals cannot win national elections.
If the democrats don't start putting our nations interest ahead of their political interests, they will become nothing more than a regional political afterthought.
No, No, that IS the definition. What's the RE-definition?
Maybe the Dem's are too busy REDEFINING other words, like MARRIAGE and IS!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.