Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Melas
I've always thought the whole mandate idea was ludicrous. If you win, you have a mandate. Period. The guy who loses, he's the one who ain't got no mandate. :)

It's not quite that simple. Mandates require a candidate to put his ideological cards on the table, so that his votes aren't votes for personalities and vague slogans. President Bush did that in this campaign and therefore has a mandate to pursue those ideological points.

On the other hand, when Presidents Reagan and Clinton were reelected, they went with warm and fuzzy slogans, so that while they had more decisive Electoral College victories, they didn't have mandates for anything more than being warm and fuzzy in their second terms.

Bush risked more ideologically, so when he won, he received a mandate.

84 posted on 11/07/2004 8:04:19 AM PST by Fatalis (John Kyl in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Fatalis

Oh come on. Reagan's landslide victory was surely a mandate.


99 posted on 11/07/2004 8:09:44 AM PST by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: Fatalis

well put.


115 posted on 11/07/2004 8:16:44 AM PST by SunkenCiv ("All I have seen teaches me trust the Creator for all I have not seen." -- Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson