Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NittanyLion
In a fantastic election season, this will be deemed the most serious misjudgment the GOP made. I agree, If Pennsylvania will elect Santorum, they would have elected Toomey.
147 posted on 11/07/2004 8:35:29 AM PST by Fzob (Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Fzob

----I agree, If Pennsylvania will elect Santorum, they would have elected Toomey.----

Pennsylvania also elected Ed Rendell. And voted to elect John Kerry. Specter is popular in Pennsylvania for some damn reason; I think the White House had to make a choice between keeping the seat in GOP hands, and trading Specter for a guy who would have voted against Bush's nominees and policies 100% of the time.

-Dan

152 posted on 11/07/2004 8:41:37 AM PST by Flux Capacitor (HEY, DEMOCRATS: WE WILL BURY YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: Fzob
Kerry---- 2,883,833-51%
Hoeffel---2,295,305-42%

Bush-----2,756,361-49%
Specter--2,890,818-53%
Clymer-----216,930-4%

Note the following:

1. Hoeffel received almost 600,000 fewer votes than Kerry. Does he suddenly receive these votes if he runs against Toomey as opposed to Specter?

2. Assume Specter votes less Bush votes are Demo crossover voters for Specter (134K) that would've gone for Hoeffel, but also assume Clymer voters (216K) go for Toomey. The result is a modest Toomey win.

IMHO, the numbers show Toomey would've had an advantage in the race.

172 posted on 11/07/2004 9:03:15 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson