Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beavus
Any "point" in a continuum of change is arbitrary. ... Since I brought it up, what criteria do determine rights? 10 fingers and 10 toes?

From the standpoint of your question as posed, there's no "continuum" involved. Once "it" is a living human being -- i.e., at conception, which is not arbitrary at all -- then "it" is a person and should have rights at that time.

47 posted on 11/07/2004 6:57:09 AM PST by CaptainVictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: CaptainVictory
From the standpoint of your question as posed, there's no "continuum" involved. Once "it" is a living human being -- i.e., at conception, which is not arbitrary at all -- then "it" is a person and should have rights at that time.

Strictly speaking, all biological phenomena are on a continuum. Our need for discrete terminology doesn't trump the laws of physics. So, of course you are wrong. There are a continua of chemical processes involved in the process of conception (albeit over a short period compared to gestation time).

Still, what criteria determine rights?

56 posted on 11/07/2004 7:28:02 AM PST by beavus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson