Skip to comments.
Bush Stands by Rejection of Kyoto Treaty
Associated Press ^
| 11/06/04
| Associated Press
Posted on 11/07/2004 12:42:52 AM PST by advance_copy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Just one in a long list of reasons why Bush's re-election was right for America.
To: advance_copy
Just one in a long list of reasons why Bush's re-election was right for America. Agreed he's not falling for the "fairy tales" of global warming!
To: advance_copy
The enviro wackos want to saddle Americans with higher costs without showing they result in a significant improvement in environmental quality.
3
posted on
11/07/2004 12:47:37 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: advance_copy
4
posted on
11/07/2004 12:47:46 AM PST
by
GeronL
(Congratulations Bush on your re-election VICTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: advance_copy
Just one in a long list of reasons why Bush's re-election was right for America.
My Donations of time and money have all ready been rewarded. Thank God for W! No time to waste on this junk science "global warming" Anyone who has paid ANY attention to the objective facts know the Sun Spot Cycles have a LOT more effect on global temperature then any emissions.
5
posted on
11/07/2004 12:49:46 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(We got the mandate, now let's GOVERN!)
To: MNJohnnie
I'm not convinced that global warming isn't occurring. I am convinced that even if it is, Kyoto would do nothing but cripple the US economy.
6
posted on
11/07/2004 12:52:11 AM PST
by
ThinkDifferent
(A plan is not a litany of complaints)
To: ThinkDifferent
global warming is occurring but the issue is what's causing it?
Is it natural?
To: ThinkDifferent
Right! And the Kyoto treaty will create a UN managed CO2 trading market.
8
posted on
11/07/2004 12:58:10 AM PST
by
kipita
(Rebel – the proletariat response to Aristocracy and Exploitation.)
To: america-rules
Think 'solar activity'.
Activity or lack of activity WRT sunspots has been linked to global temperatures since the 15th century. There has been no proven causation between man made activity and global warming.
9
posted on
11/07/2004 1:02:11 AM PST
by
flashbunny
(Every thought that enters my head requires its own vanity thread.)
To: kipita
I'm sure the UN will be able to run that without corruption....
10
posted on
11/07/2004 1:02:46 AM PST
by
flashbunny
(Every thought that enters my head requires its own vanity thread.)
To: ThinkDifferent
"not convinced that global warming isn't occurring"
Anyone who has paid ANY attention to the objective facts know the Sun Spot Cycles have a LOT more effect on global temperature then any emissions. Global Warming may or may not be happening but it is NOT caused by man made emissions.
11
posted on
11/07/2004 1:08:34 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(We got the mandate, now let's GOVERN!)
To: ThinkDifferent
Notice how the liberal media skewed their report about the "300 scientists" and the rise of temperature in the Arctic regions. First of all, does anybody even live there. Second, 300 scientists do not constitute a consensus among all scientists. Where was the alternative opinion...lost in the cloud of liberal media bias, of course.
12
posted on
11/07/2004 1:20:44 AM PST
by
Daner313
(Bush has crushed Monsieur Kerry!! OUI! OUI!)
To: goldstategop
And of course, "enviro-whacko-ism" is just a front for anti-capitalism, aka, communism.
To: advance_copy
This nonsense has been going on since the Clinton administration's diversion from terror. Any further mention of Kyoto should be met with a third and final atomic drop... Expel Kerry to the hague where he can harangue against his lessers in international debate... Kerry's a mediocre moron... America really dodged a bullet on this one! Kerry's plan to fight global terror: " Name them and shame them in the global Community of Nations". What a less than worthless piece of whatever you can think of...
14
posted on
11/07/2004 1:45:48 AM PST
by
BloodScarletMinnesota
(MPLS Star-Tribune;America's Most Ridiculed Newspaper(NYT,1995))
To: advance_copy
President Bush is holding fast to his rejection of mandatory curbs on greenhouse gases... And once again, thank God for President Bush's re-election!
15
posted on
11/07/2004 1:46:53 AM PST
by
Prime Choice
(The Democrats vowed 'no surrender.' It's time to make them wish they had.)
To: Prime Choice
The Kyoto Protocol is a sham. Mr.Bush is making the right decision.
16
posted on
11/07/2004 1:54:48 AM PST
by
Bandaneira
(The Third Temple/House for All Nations/World Peace Centre...Coming Soon...)
To: advance_copy
17
posted on
11/07/2004 1:57:31 AM PST
by
k2blader
(It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
To: advance_copy
It would never pass the senate anyway, and I don't think it was ever intended to. The sole purpose is giving the Left around the world something to perpetually whine about.
18
posted on
11/07/2004 1:59:47 AM PST
by
Moonman62
(Federal Creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it.)
To: advance_copy
It's a long haul to 2008. You have to get in and start attacking Bush right away.
One of the best things Bush could do with this insane treaty is put it before the Senate. Make the Democrats in the Senate vote on it.
That, at least, will put a stop to this nonsense about "Bush rejecting" the treaty.
That thing is *never* going to get 2/3 of the Senate in the United States.
19
posted on
11/07/2004 2:02:42 AM PST
by
Timm
To: advance_copy
Even if "greenhouse gases" are causing "global warming" (and I've seen no real proof that they are), why is that a bad thing? If the Earth gets warmer, don't more plants grow, creating more oxygen and eliminating more carbon dioxide? What do these so-called "experts" want, another ice age? And how do they know that this warming isn't part of a natural cycle? Also, the Kyoto Treaty is very biased against the United States, and lenient to other nations.
20
posted on
11/07/2004 3:27:07 AM PST
by
The Loan Arranger
(The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson