In reality, both Clinton and Bush are equal in theory to what they feel will "solve" the conflict. A two-state solution, and dealing with the Palestinian Authority (and ceding land to it). Clinton had his Oslo Accords, Bush has his Roadmap. Sure Clinton dealt with Arafat, but Bush is dealing with another head of that very same regime.
So they don't see any difference. The only difference really is the amount of time spent by both presidents to try to achieve this goal.
If they do not see any difference, they are not looking.
Clinton put all the pressure on Israel to make concessions-which they did.
With Bush it is the opposite, he is waiting for the Palestinians to end their terrorism.
Isn't it true, from what I read, that most American Jews who were living in Israel voted for Bush?