Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Restart the Reagan Revolution
HUMAN EVENTS ^ | Posted Nov 5, 2004 | Michael Reagan

Posted on 11/06/2004 9:45:53 AM PST by Former Military Chick

In 2001 the new Bush Administration was seen by most conservatives as a rebirth of the Reagan Revolution begun by my dad but left unfinished, with much to be done to get this nation back on the right track after years of floundering in a morass of socialist schemes and the accompanying fiscal irresponsibility.

It was a massive job, and Ronald Reagan went a long way towards getting it done and what he was able to do was invigorated by a majority of Americans, with both Republicans and Reagan Democrats firmly in his corner.

That was a big part of his legacy--the rebirth of America's inborn conservatism. It helped carry the Reaganesque George W. Bush into the White House. Bush was my father's natural heir, and he was expected to pick up the torch of the Reagan Revolution and carry it on.

The President tried hard but found himself facing a hostile Democrat contingent in the Senate that over the last four years made obstructionism its strategy and battle cry. The Reagan Revolution stalled.

Last Tuesday the Democrat's paid the price when obstructionist-in-chief Tom Daschle went down to an ignominious defeat and the Republican majority swelled to the point where the President can now expect to push much of his agenda through. The Reagan Revolution can now move forward.

George Bush has won the election--for the next four years he doesn't have to worry about being re-elected. It's now time to start limiting government. It's time to get back to fiscal responsibility and to do all the things Republicans are supposed to do: work for less government, fewer taxes, and implementing the ownership society. President has four years to streamline this country and make it run like a smooth engine.

If he does these things we won't have to worry about Hillary becoming President in 2008. We can look forward to the next President being a Republican because Republicans were able to reform government and take those issues away from the Democrats in the future.

Here's what the President must do:

He must get the deficit under control. It has to start coming down and he has four years to do it.

He should work with Congress to enact a line item veto that will survive judicial scrutiny so that the President can winnow out those budget-busting pork-barrel items Congress loves to pile on legislation.

The President has to convince Democrats in the Senate to allow his nominees to the federal bench an up-or-down vote on the floor of the Senate--an opportunity most of them have been denied.

Second only to fiscal responsibility is tort reform. Without tort reform we will not be able to bring corporations back home to America, or get health care costs under control. We are losing doctors left and right thanks to a torrent of malpractice lawsuits and outrageous jury awards which have escalated malpractice insurance rates to the point where physicians cannot afford them without raising their fees or just quitting their practices.

The regulatory burden on companies must be lifted to allow American industry to expand and not be outforced instead of outsourced. It is the outforcing of jobs and corporations that have created outsourcing. Together with tort reform this action can keep jobs and the companies that create them here at home.

Tax reform is a must. Our burdensome and absurd tax code must be junked and replaced with a sensible revenue-raising system that does not punish success as does the current tax system.

We must deal with the out-of-control crisis of illegal immigration.

These are some of the things that will revive and advance the Reagan Revolution.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; reagan
While I understand the son of Reagan would feel this way, I do think Bush retained his office not only by the likes of us on FR, but, due to Bush'es own merit.

Bush, clearly has much to offer our country. While I think the Reagan Revolution is something to consider why not find a new catch phraise for President Bush. I do believe he earned it Michael. But your dad did provide an excellent road map.

1 posted on 11/06/2004 9:45:54 AM PST by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Bush is his own man.


2 posted on 11/06/2004 9:48:16 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chieftain; Ragtime Cowgirl; gatorbait; GreyFriar; americanmother; The Mayor; Seadog Bytes; ...

Michael Reagan **ping**


3 posted on 11/06/2004 9:52:00 AM PST by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Let's restart things with Specter's removal from the Senate Judiciary Committee!

Senate Judiciary Committee GOP Members

Contact Senator Orrin Hatch
202-224-5251

Contact Senator Charles Grassley
202-224-3744

Contact Senator Jon Kyl
202-224-4521

Contact Senator Mike DeWine
202-224-2315

Contact Senator Jeff Sessions
202-224-4124

Contact Senator Lindsey Graham
-202-224-5972

Contact Senator Larry Craig
202-224-2752

Contact Senator Saxby Chambliss
202-224-3521

Contact Senator John Cornyn
202-224-2934


4 posted on 11/06/2004 9:53:58 AM PST by GeneralHavoc (Want to Help Pat Toomey? Join Toomey Meetup!: http://www.toomeyforsenate.meetup.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
The President has to convince Democrats in the Senate to allow his nominees to the federal bench an up-or-down vote on the floor of the Senate

No, he doesn't. The rules presently allowing filibusters on nominations are just that, rules, they are not part of the Constitution. Any rule can be changed by majority vote of the Senate.

All that is needed is for the Republican majority to grow some cojones and make rule changes limiting filibustering in an appropriate way.

5 posted on 11/06/2004 10:01:19 AM PST by Restorer (Europe is heavily armed, but only with envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
But your dad did provide an excellent road map.

That was drawn by Barry Goldwater.

6 posted on 11/06/2004 10:18:29 AM PST by elbucko ( Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elbucko

I stand corrected thank you. :)


7 posted on 11/06/2004 10:19:18 AM PST by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Viva La Reagan Revolucion!


8 posted on 11/06/2004 10:23:07 AM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Here's what I would like to see in Bush's second term:

A Presidential line-item veto that passes Constitutional muster (to be used judiciously against dems and RINOs), a serious reduction of the national debt, a balanced budget amendment (I know I'm dreaming), making the tax cuts permanent, tax code simplification, tort reform, reducing dependency on foreign oil, strengthening the dollar, closing the trade deficit, expanding the ABM defense comprehensively, keeping our national laboratories on the cutting edge of technology, keeping NATO and the PSI relevant, and not the least of which is finishing the path to democracy for Iraq and Afghanistan. (I know I'm forgetting stuff...)

To be honest, I'm really excited about the possibilities that Bush's second term holds. I hope we get a lot done.


9 posted on 11/06/2004 10:23:53 AM PST by Norman Bates (Game over. Bush wins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
The President has to convince Democrats...

Convince? We doan' neeed no steeenking "convinces"..!

You're right, the Republicans can make the rules. If they have guts. If the Republicans start to worry about reelection, their knees will go weak.

10 posted on 11/06/2004 10:25:41 AM PST by elbucko ( Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

;^)


11 posted on 11/06/2004 10:28:16 AM PST by elbucko ( Feral Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Oh yeah, Usama Bin Laden at Gitmo.


12 posted on 11/06/2004 10:31:09 AM PST by Norman Bates (Game over. Bush wins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

All good ideas, but Bush pretty much abandoned the Reagan ideasof smaller less intrusive government and went the other way.

It will certainly be interesting to see what happens with re-election in hand. I am not optomistic, though.


13 posted on 11/06/2004 10:31:58 AM PST by TomDoniphon68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

The line item veto gives the power to legislate to the president. It'll never happen and probably shouldn't.


14 posted on 11/06/2004 10:34:24 AM PST by sixmil (11/2/2004 - And there will be great wailing and gnashing of teeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson