Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Colofornian

You have a point there. It still holds true, however, that it doesn't matter if you have the "right" position on any issue if you can't get elected. If he's going to be a roving candidate, he might do better in a deep South state, where both whites and blacks are more socially conservative. But then, he's Catholic, which may go against him even more than being black.


67 posted on 11/05/2004 7:39:44 PM PST by wimpycat (John Kerry has a fevah, and the only prescription is "MORE COWBELL".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: wimpycat

=== But then, he's Catholic, which may go against him even more than being black.


He should come to Louisiana.

Unfortunately, our most successful "Republicans" are all "former Democrats" so it's doubtful he'd be as popular with the party bosses as he would be with the people.


84 posted on 11/05/2004 7:56:55 PM PST by Askel5 († Cooperatio voluntaria ad suicidium est legi morali contraria. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: wimpycat

Well, laying aside the "can't" get elected and refering to those who don't hold office - does Rush do no good? Sean Hannity? Bill Bennett? Jack Kemp? Newt Gingrich? None of the intellectuals and "idea men" in the GOP do any good because they don't currently hold office?

There's more than one way to affect change in this country.


151 posted on 11/05/2004 11:09:57 PM PST by WillRain ("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson