Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Graybeard58
Specter won't try to block any nominees, he didn't say he would- in fact he said he wouldn't. He can't anyway if the majority of the committee doesn't want to.


But 40 Dems will block all pro-life judges, just as Specter said.

This is the silliest cause I've seen on FR since the contrail people used to come by.

33 posted on 11/05/2004 6:53:32 AM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice.. NOT Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
Specter won't try to block any nominees, he didn't say he would- in fact he said he wouldn't. He can't anyway if the majority of the committee doesn't want to.

The current make-up of the committee is 10 R's and 9 D's. If Specter votes with the RATs, the R's on the committee are outnumbered.

But 40 Dems will block all pro-life judges, just as Specter said.

Not if Frist changes the rules - which will be easier with 4 new R Senators.

This is the silliest cause I've seen on FR since the contrail people used to come by.

Then I suggest that you just step aside. The rest of us don't take Specter's duplicity lightly.

67 posted on 11/05/2004 7:30:24 AM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson