Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Did Pete Coors Lose?
DenverPost.com ^ | November 03, 2004 | Karen E. Crummy and Mark P. Couch

Posted on 11/04/2004 5:17:00 PM PST by cilbupeR_eerF

Ken Salazar's campaign plan put him in position to overcome a GOP voter-registration edge and beat out Republican Pete Coors for Colorado's U.S. Senate seat.

Coors, a political neophyte, entwined himself with the policies and rhetoric of President Bush, stressing tax cuts, a strong national defense and "conservative Colorado family values."

Salazar, the state attorney general, shunned most associations with John Kerry yet echoed his populist message, vowing to help the working class and rural communities.

"Coors needs Bush to win really big so he can ride on his coattails, and Salazar needs to look independent so he isn't pegged as a liberal like Kerry," said Jennifer Duffy, a Senate analyst with the Cook Political Report.

Additionally, both candidates needed to win over a significant number of unaffiliated voters.

Because registered Democrats trail Republicans by about 180,000 voters in the state, Coors had a built-in advantage. He also had tremendous name recognition and the benefit of presidential and vice-presidential visits. But his campaign said he needed more than a 20,000-vote edge coming out of Arapahoe and Jefferson counties to offset Salazar's numbers in Boulder.

Early exit polling, however, suggested Coors was significantly trailing Salazar in Arapahoe and Jefferson counties.

And Kerry, despite Salazar's arms-length attitude toward him, ultimately may have helped Salazar - by not hurting him.

Salazar only appeared with Kerry on one of the Massachusetts senator's six forays to Colorado. But on Election Day, it appeared that Kerry was staying competitive in the state, meaning that Salazar didn't have to rely on large numbers of Bush voters crossing over to help him.

Salazar needed not only the unaffiliated voters, but about 8 percent to 10 percent of moderate Republicans, according to his campaign. He also had to win big in metro Denver and win converts in rural communities that tend to vote Republican. As a result, he traveled throughout the state, talking to farmers and ranchers and portraying himself as a moderate.

Early exit polling showed Salazar way ahead of Coors among unaffiliated voters, as well as siphoning off some Republicans. He clearly made a dent in rural Colorado.

Additionally, despite Coors' attempts to emphasize his family in the last days of the campaign, Salazar clobbered the Republican among female voters.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: coors; election; electionussenate; salazar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: what's up

James Dobson is from Colorado, Focus on the Family is based south of Denver in Colorado Springs.


41 posted on 11/04/2004 5:47:40 PM PST by Castro (Moses supposes his toeses are roses...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cilbupeR_eerF

saying you want to lower the drinking age to 18 when your
name is Coors may not be a wise tactical move...


42 posted on 11/04/2004 5:49:24 PM PST by Rakkasan1 (Justice of the Piece: Hope IS on the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cilbupeR_eerF
Four wealthy activists quietly financed Tuesday's stunning switch of the Colorado legislature to a Democratic majority, pouring an unprecedented $1.6 million into traditionally low-budget races.

The stealth campaign to upend Colorado politics began a year ago. Retired Colorado State University President Al Yates was the visionary behind it, said organizer Michael Huttner.

With financial backing from billionaire medical-equipment heiress Pat Stryker, Internet entrepreneur and state Board of Education Chairman Jared Polis, Quark founder Tim Gill and software entrepreneur Rutt Bridges, a broad coalition of political-interest groups joined together, said Huttner.

The groups - those concerned with social and educational issues, as well as environmentalists, working-family and pro-choice advocates, unions and teachers - felt their issues had been ignored by a Republican-dominated legislature concerned only with "God and gays," according to Huttner.

"We said, 'We've got to make the run of our lives because we cannot continue to have this right-wing leadership run this state into the ground,' " he said.

They raised $2 million, 80 percent of it from the four key backers, and took advantage of new campaign finance laws that have spawned big spending from independent political committees.

Colorado Republican Party Chairman Ted Halaby said a 3-to-1 Democratic spending advantage was the primary reason the Republicans lost.

"The Democrats figured out the new financing laws better than we did," Halaby said. "What they did is keep big money in this that was unaccountable and below the radar."

The targeted Democratic candidates pulled off their surprise wins Tuesday, turning a nine-seat deficit in the House into a majority of two, and possibly three, seats.

Rocky Mountain News, November 4, 2004

Salazar also had a brother running for another office. I don't know that a lot of people knew that their were two "Salazars". I believe the two sets of ads reinforced one another to an extent.

The state Republican Party was caught flatfooted with all the Democrat fat cat money poured into the statewide races. Hopefully that won't happen again in 2006.

Governor Owens will be catching some flack over this. But word is he's off to D.C.

43 posted on 11/04/2004 5:50:53 PM PST by Semi Civil Servant (This space for sale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Coors hired Mary Cheney to get the homosexual boycott of Coors stopped. She also has worked for the Colorado Rockies. The Cheney/Coors connection goes back a long way.


44 posted on 11/04/2004 5:56:18 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
Coors said that if 18 year olds are allowed to die for their country in the military then they should be able to come home on leave and buy a beer.

Coors' remarks were still stupid, IMO. He runs a beer company, for crying out loud, and he makes a beer-related statement?

And besides, 18-21 year-olds in the military can drink alcoholic beverages, in most cases. So Coors' point was moot.

45 posted on 11/04/2004 5:58:28 PM PST by BlkConserv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Castro

Even more amusing is that Salazar probably received more gay votes than Coors anyway. Just goes to show you what happens when Republicans pander to the the unpanderable.


46 posted on 11/04/2004 6:02:00 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cilbupeR_eerF
I'm not a local, but I honestly looked at this canidate and thought "Beer does not equal morals in my opinion". That was all that ran thru my head at the time to be honest and this is the first I have heard since this election on him.

So, yes, I would say morality oriented people probable did not favor his profession.

47 posted on 11/04/2004 6:02:07 PM PST by LowOiL (Christian and proud of it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semi Civil Servant
One of the networks interviewed him on election night and I remember Owens saying that he wasn't interested in the presidency. Period. He went on to say that there were a lot of up and coming stars in the Republican party but that he wasn't interested.
Do you have more information?...I respect Owens a lot and would be enthusiastic in my support of him.
48 posted on 11/04/2004 6:02:31 PM PST by Castro (Moses supposes his toeses are roses...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

True. Unfortunately for the Republicans I think Coors' campaign was very negatively influenced by his company...from the alcohol association to the company's pandering to minority groups.


49 posted on 11/04/2004 6:05:45 PM PST by Castro (Moses supposes his toeses are roses...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: cilbupeR_eerF

He lost because he DIDN'T LISTEN TO 'OL FLAGG!!!!

((sorry))


50 posted on 11/04/2004 6:06:57 PM PST by RandallFlagg (FReepers, Do NOT let the voter fraud stories die!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediForce
Bingo ! I saw that debate...and Coors muffed some key issues...including kerrosim..er now..terrorism.

I saw that as well. My opinion is that what we had there were a couple of real lightweights. And Coors was the lightest of the two. Very weak!

51 posted on 11/04/2004 6:07:31 PM PST by Utah Binger (ArtDlr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cilbupeR_eerF

I'm not from Colorado so I could be totally off here but I think it's that he's a millionare from Denver. Being outside of Denver that's not terribly popular. They should have run Schaffer.


52 posted on 11/04/2004 6:07:32 PM PST by NeoCaveman (We have not just 4 more years, but four more Senators too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Castro
One of the networks interviewed him on election night and I remember Owens saying that he wasn't interested in the presidency. Period. He went on to say that there were a lot of up and coming stars in the Republican party but that he wasn't interested.
Do you have more information?...I respect Owens a lot and would be enthusiastic in my support of him.

Owen supposedly is off to join the Bush administration at some level. A few of his people will be joining him, so this may be a Cabinet appointment. This is the semi-private word from one of his high ranking appointees. I don't think Owens will be running for President. He wasn't interested in running for Senator and he almost certainly would have won.

53 posted on 11/04/2004 6:08:56 PM PST by Semi Civil Servant (This space for sale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Utah Binger

At least it seems like the dem we wound up with out of them is not a flaming left wing Michael Moore rumpswab ! We shall see...in time.


54 posted on 11/04/2004 6:10:09 PM PST by JediForce (To gloat or not to gloat ? That question is far to easy to be on the Global Test. GLOAT ! :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Semi Civil Servant

Thanks! That's great news.


55 posted on 11/04/2004 6:11:27 PM PST by Castro (Moses supposes his toeses are roses...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Castro
You're welcome.

But Moses supposes erroneously.

56 posted on 11/04/2004 6:14:23 PM PST by Semi Civil Servant (This space for sale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: BlkConserv
18-21 year-olds in the military can drink alcoholic beverages, in most cases. So Coors' point was moot.

Not in the United States. Only overseas and at bases within 50 miles of Canada or Mexico. You can thank MADD for that.

57 posted on 11/04/2004 6:14:41 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: frankenMonkey
Salazar's career is in public service, Coor's is not - a business heir, little more. Folks just didn't buy it.

Huh. It's usually these life-long parasites (aka "career in public service" people) who voters love to flush down the toilet.

58 posted on 11/04/2004 6:16:28 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dware
Coors sponsored a lesbian bash in Canada recently. Considering the gay bashing that went on by the American voters this last tuesday, I'd say that played a large part.

I noted no "gay bashing" by the American voter. Main Street America affirmed the true definition of marriage in eleven states. There is no proof that this is based on hatred of homosexuals.

59 posted on 11/04/2004 6:19:06 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
1. Coors didn't know his butt from a hole in the ground.

2. Coors advertises to gays in gay magazines.

3. Coors sponsers gay pride days, etc.

4. Coors = alcohol.

5. Coors and morality --- mutually exclusive.


The pubbies couldn't have picked a worse candidate.
60 posted on 11/04/2004 6:19:53 PM PST by Founding Father
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson