Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shethink13
Sigh, I actually completely agree with you about Spector.

Winning this issue -- not arguing is my single goal. The public and the arena of ideas is the battleground. That is where we have to win.

But we cannot deny the MSM still holds sway with the public and waving the Roe v Wade flag in the publics' face is the MSM's game. Reality, we need to deal with it, and defeat it.

There is more at stake than just abortion, and making abortion a litmus test feeds the MSM monster and will defeat us in our quest. Strategery is required on judges.

I don't want to blow it with any Supreme nominees.

69 posted on 11/04/2004 11:37:56 AM PST by snooker (Bush 2004 --- stay with the strong horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: snooker
There is more at stake than just abortion, and making abortion a litmus test feeds the MSM monster and will defeat us in our quest. Strategery is required on judges.

Who said we're making it a litmus test? It is Specter that's got the litmus test. My only requirement is exactly what the President calls for - someone who will strictly interpret the Constitution rather than legislate from the bench. We don't need a litmus test if they'd just stick to the law.

74 posted on 11/04/2004 11:42:11 AM PST by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson