Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP CALLS NM For Bush!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted on 11/03/2004 1:28:55 PM PST by tax hater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last
To: AxelPaulsenJr
My favorite was the earlier post. "Zogby sees late movement for Kerry"

Would that be the rapid spiral accompanying our "Flushing" of the "Two Johns"?

121 posted on 11/04/2004 1:47:33 AM PST by newzjunkey (Pray 4 America. Congratulations Bush/Cheney '04! Now the hard work begins...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
There reason Card said "a minimum" is it could've been 286 or 287 if Bush gets Iowa too is that Maine is *not* "winner take all" so Bush could still get one electoral vote from Maine.

Maine gives 2 electoral votes to the statewide winner. 1 electoral vote each goes to the winners of each of its two congressional districts. They've had that system since 1969 and *never* split up their 4 electoral votes but some thought there could be a 3-1 split this year based on polling.

And, now, Bangor Daily News says it's been determined all four will goto Kerry. The article I link to says Kerry won Maine's two congressional districts, thus all the electors, on the economy and Iraq and Kerry had a better GOTV effort in Maine.

122 posted on 11/04/2004 2:01:37 AM PST by newzjunkey (Pray 4 America. Congratulations Bush/Cheney '04! Now the hard work begins...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

I haven't seen demographic breakdown. I'd like to see how Bush did with gays, blacks, jews and hispanics. I heard he did 5% better with hispanics in FL than in 2000 but nothing else about these other historically Democrat groups... In 2000 Bush got 25% of the gay vote and 9:1 blacks went for Gore.


123 posted on 11/04/2004 2:03:54 AM PST by newzjunkey (Pray 4 America. Congratulations Bush/Cheney '04! Now the hard work begins...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Luke21; BonnieJ
Luke, I think you make an error in confusing "mandate" with the term "coattails" and Reagan did not have "coattails" as you point out since the GOP lost ground in Congress. Reagan, however, he had a mammoth reelection mandate: the largest in the nation's history.

Bush has coattails which is very, very important given his modest reelection mandate. Considering he turned at least one, perhaps, two Gore states (perhaps net +1) and broke the 50% mark--unlike Clinton, I would not say Bush anyone could claim he has no mandate.

The "largest number of voters" of all presidential candidates is more a talking point preemptive strike in light of Florida and Kerry's inability to concede in a timely manner rather than of useful value since the nation's population has increased since even the Reagan reelection 20 years ago.

124 posted on 11/04/2004 2:16:33 AM PST by newzjunkey (Pray 4 America. Congratulations Bush/Cheney '04! Now the hard work begins...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

I heard on the radio news yesterday that many more hispanics than expected had voted for Bush.


125 posted on 11/04/2004 4:46:38 AM PST by snopercod (Inflation, it's how wars are paid for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Great post.

You laugh, but I think that they really intended to use the exit poll data as a basis to challenge the results to get the illegal, provisional ballots to count in the case of a close election. 1) They stuffed the ballot boxes with provisional ballots, 2) their mantra "every vote counts and every vote will be counted", 3) their unrelenting hammer of Gore would have won if the votes were counted, and 4) the DNC directive to cry "voter intimidation".

Fortunately, as Hugh Hewitt says, "If it's not close, they can't cheat." God Bless George W. Bush and our great country.


126 posted on 11/04/2004 5:41:21 AM PST by infogeekmom (Bush, Burr, Ballantine (well at least Bush and Burr))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

I welcome them to the party of personal responsibility and freedom. Go W!


127 posted on 11/04/2004 5:43:55 AM PST by infogeekmom (Bush, Burr, Ballantine (well at least Bush and Burr))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: tax hater

I see CNN has not called NM and Iowa for Bush43 yet!!!!! Disgusting.


128 posted on 11/04/2004 5:46:08 AM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus
I want Wisconsin!

Wisconsin has already been called for Kerry, right?

129 posted on 11/04/2004 5:49:32 AM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DM1

Is Iowa called for Bush too?


130 posted on 11/04/2004 6:28:17 AM PST by SolomoninSouthDakota (Daschle is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chris9soccer

21 EV's? Hasn't it always been 20?


131 posted on 11/04/2004 6:30:22 AM PST by SolomoninSouthDakota (Daschle is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Maine must not have split, I take it.


132 posted on 11/04/2004 6:31:29 AM PST by SolomoninSouthDakota (Daschle is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SolomoninSouthDakota

According to CBS, they have fake but accurate documents showing that this race is still too close to call.


133 posted on 11/04/2004 6:32:31 AM PST by JennyG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: SolomoninSouthDakota

Correct, Maine did not split. FOX had them at 3 EVs for Skurry throughout the early returns, and finally gave Skurry the fourth EV sometime after 11pm if memory serves.


134 posted on 11/04/2004 6:33:10 AM PST by UncleSamUSA (the land of the free and the home of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom

you got that right - they were waiting - or should I say lying in wait - for a big Ohio legal armageddon battle and wanted to steal those states during the chaos to help tip it to the continental one.


135 posted on 11/04/2004 6:41:09 AM PST by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SolomoninSouthDakota

No, I believe Maine went 4-0 for Kerry.


136 posted on 11/04/2004 6:47:51 AM PST by AmishDude (Hammacher Schlemmer has better submarines than the Canadian Navy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush

Incredibly, yes, it was called as early as midnight by at least one network. The gap is 11,000 votes, or far, far less than the 1/2 of 1% which would trigger an automatic recount. (Since the national election is not in question, I don't know if the recount gets triggered.)


137 posted on 11/04/2004 6:55:47 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush

Incredibly, yes, it was called as early as midnight by at least one network. The gap is 11,000 votes, or far, far less than the 1/2 of 1% which would trigger an automatic recount. (Since the national election is not in question, I don't know if the recount gets triggered.)

...Oh, and it did tighten up from 14,000 to 11,000 yesterday.


138 posted on 11/04/2004 6:56:19 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Moconservative

Has anyone given Bush Iowa yet?
Has New Mexico found all their ballot boxes?
Bush's lead of 3.5 million should rise after military votes are counted.
In 2000 Bush got 31 states with Iowa & N.M. he would have 32 this time as one red state went blue.


139 posted on 11/04/2004 7:07:05 AM PST by hubno (hub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Thanks. :^)


140 posted on 11/04/2004 7:51:19 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson