Replies

> ... we ought to take the victory and be happy.
> He has been marginalized.

Disagree.

Apart from the fact that he is still in the Senate, and
positioned and motivated to continue his legacy of doing
nothing (except sell out the US), there is ...

... the not insignificant matter of the total stonewall
by the legacy media in looking into his record. Had they
invested 1% of the effort they spent trying to find some
bad TANG on Bush, they would have discovered major
smoking guns (several right on published Kerry docs).

The legacy media needs to have their face rubbed in the
Kerry Kover-up. And if Kerry loses his re-election in
2006, of even faces a recall in a few months, I have no
problem with that.

Kerry built the core of his campaign on a fraud. That
fraud is not fully exposed.

Those voters duped by his fraud need to learn both about
him, and about the propaganda mills that covered for him.

The legacy media needs to have their face rubbed in the Kerry Kover-up. And if Kerry loses his re-election in 2006, of even faces a recall in a few months, I have no problem with that.

GOOD POINT

If we attack the media with their complicity and bias on their blatant avoidance of this real issue, I could get behind that. I just don't want us to hurt ourselves by appearing petty over something that is over. (Kerry's campaign)

THE MEDIA BIAS IS NOT OVER.

Those voters duped by his fraud need to learn both about him, and about the propaganda mills that covered for him.

Amen, Boundless. The electorate in a free society have the right to the truth. The politicians and the media have the obligation to provide it...otherwise, call them what they are: Fifth Columnists.