Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WILDBILLIE
As a small business i now collect sales tax for the state and it is so simple to fill out the report and pay it quarterly it only takes about a 1/2 hour. I would be happy to to do the same for the federal government. I hate the income tax and the government would collect much more with the sales tax and it would expose the underground economy.

I have lived in Britain where they have a VAT, and I'm telling you there are lots of businesses that sell goods "off the books" to avoid the VAT. There is a large bureaucracy there involved in making sure people in the retail trade actually remit their taxes.

58 posted on 11/03/2004 11:28:46 AM PST by FreedomCalls (It's a joke, people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls

I too have lived and worked in the UK, and I would guess that the vast majority of business there don't play games with the VAT. But those poor bastards get taxed at every turn (example: 80p for a liter of petrol, about 75% of which is tax). How do you think they would feel about Inland Revenue being abolished?


69 posted on 11/03/2004 11:37:33 AM PST by tgusa (USN A-6 pilot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomCalls

I have lived in Britain where they have a VAT,

The NRST is not a VAT, it does not tax business purchases, the tax is leveled only on sale for final consumption, i.e. retail.

 

Definition [ http://www.encyclopedia.com/articles/13330.html ]:

value-added tax
levy imposed on businesses at all levels of production of a good or service, and based on the increase in price, or value, added to the good or service by each level. Because all stages of a value-added tax are ultimately passed on to the consumer in the form of higher prices, it has been described as a hidden sales tax. Originally introduced in France (1954), it is now used by most W European countries.

and I'm telling you there are lots of businesses that sell goods "off the books" to avoid the VAT.

If they are not paying the tax, since business purchases are not taxed, selling goods "off the books" only makes the liable to enforcement provisions, and the purchaser getting a good deal. Think about it. More than 80% of retail dollar volume passes through the 20% of businesses (the largest) that are not about to put there business in jeopardy for not collecting a tax from a customer.

Today, the underground cash economy thrives by evading the 40%+ marginal tax rate of the the income/payroll tax system, mainly by indivduals and single proprietors not reporting their income. Under an income/payroll tax system it only takes one to cheat, with a retail sales tax, you have let every customer in on the secret or at least a potential witness to the fact of cheating/embezzelment via a fraudulent sales slip.

121 posted on 11/03/2004 12:21:57 PM PST by ancient_geezer (Equality, the French disease: Everyone is equal beneath the guillotine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomCalls

Ummmmm, the NRST is not a VAT. I would fight extremely hard against any VAT, however, the NRST sounds like a great solution to the problems we have with our tax system today. Why do you "flat-taxers" fight so hard against the NRST when you can't offer a realistic alternative as a solution with enough support to see passage?


239 posted on 11/03/2004 8:12:18 PM PST by CSM (Freepin from home for the first time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson