Posted on 11/03/2004 4:35:09 AM PST by igoramus987
New Hampshire
287 of 301 precincts - 95.35 percent
John F. Kerry Dem 323,574 - 50.48 percent
George W. Bush (i) Rep 313,186 - 48.86 percent
Ralph Nader Ind 4,214 - 1 percent
If Iowa and New Mexico are too close to call, then New Hampshire should also be too close to call.
Without Ohio... 254 + Iowa (7) + New Mexico (5) + New Hampshire (4) = 270
Although this is not likely because we are behind in New Hampshire, but still a possibility.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Right, they have not been consistent at all.
But that's why we're here! Freeregards, V's wife
Of course, it is but when did that ever stop the Rosenberg media from participating in a DemonRat hoax.
Of course, it is but when did that ever stop the Rosenberg media from participating in a DemonRat hoax.
FR is good!
What they are saying is that they won't be put in the position of calling a winner in the election...I suppose they will wait til the votes are certified many days from now?..
Of course they won't call it for Bush..check back next time there's a dem in this position.
So are German Shepherds! (I own one :)
If it's close against Bush they call it for Kerry. If it's close for Bush, it's too close to call.
If they're not going to call a winner, then they should refrain from calling any of the states. What they've done by calling all the states but a couple, is chaotic. Well, it really shouldn't be their job to call the winner anyway. Just announce it at the end after the people really in charge of these things have tallied everything up. I thought we learned a lesson in 2000, but maybe we're just slow.
In NH here with a fading bit of hope.
we tried freepers. but I think to many transplants
I had a bad feeling yesterday when I went to the polling station in Meredith and all I saw was Kerry signs.
The demographics of New Hampshire are changing - in two years it'll be another Vermont. Massachusetts and New York liberals bringing their politics with them as they move into The Granite State. The reliable GOP bastions of Old New England are history.
MSNBC has NH still as a toss up.
Its sad but I have to agree with you.
maybe the free state project can save us but not likely.
A big problem with NH is the presence of large university communities. The Peoples' Autonomous Academic Oblasts of Keene (Keene St. U.) and Hanover (Dartmouth) went very heavily for Kerry.
Your are right on with that comment. I found it interesting when our local radio station had a live interview with the president of the firefighters union Local 1009(from Worcester,MA) reporting from a NH polling place yesterday afternoon. Why would a local union leader travel to NH? Why couldn't he and his group be "helping out" in their own city or state?
the union guys were all over Merrimack County. There were folks outside the Franklin City Hall holding leftie signs who clearly were not locals.
Are there any reports of MA residents travelling to NH to vote? Is it possible in that state?
You make a great point. I worked at the Polls in the seacoast area all day, and found that many were UNH students and students from smaller colleges in the area. I had a couple of college age persons come up to me and ask if they could vote even though they don't live in my community, or New Hampshire for that matter (they came from Mass/Maine).
These people were turned away.
I knew New Hampshire would be close.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.