Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JustPiper
Bell that doesn't have to be part of a plane, why not part of a missile?

The amount of damage done the the pentagon is far more severe than an F-16 mounted air-to-air missile could ever produce. Airforce missiles do not have the fancy paint job shown in the photo, nor the thin, aluminum skin present in the photo. The missile story is bogus, internet rumor, urban legend, et al.

2,149 posted on 11/08/2004 12:57:50 PM PST by Godzilla (Geologists make the best intelligence officers because they are used to dealing with screwed up data)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2124 | View Replies ]


To: Godzilla
Also, if you view the video on this page by CNN, there is clearly no missile entering the building from the sky.
2,154 posted on 11/08/2004 1:12:46 PM PST by lahargis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2149 | View Replies ]

To: Godzilla

One other small problem with the missle/no plane theory. Several thousand people on 395 and the adjacent roads witnessed the plane hit the building. I have personally spoken with one eye-witness who will NEVER forget the site of a plane moving at that speed and height.


2,167 posted on 11/08/2004 2:02:53 PM PST by Iron Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson