I think it can cut both ways. As an attorney, he may hold the prosecutors to a higher standard than others. After all, BRD is somewhat subjective. On the other hand, he is smart enough to be able to see the "big picture" and put the pieces together (contrary to Justin Falconer who is as dumb as a box of hair, IMO). The fact that he was selected as the foreperson tells me that the jury sees him as an authority. Therefore, his opinion (whatever it is) may really influence others. Therefore, it's really bad news for the prosecution if this guy is for acquittal.
Then again, does this MD/JD want to go down in the history books wtih his picture next to those OJ jurors? Everybody in the WORLD knows Snot is guilty.
There are so many ways to interpret this. But i still bet for 2 convictions of 1st degree murder with the death penalty imposed. Maybe that's wishful, but it's also deserved.