Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meyer
I think it has something to do with where you appeal cases. I think there is a 'pecking order'. Not the legal term, but I remember hearing about cases that got turned back by Fed Appeals court as 'not ripe' meaning hadn't happened, or hadn't gone through all lower level appeals.

I also think that unless it IS a federal constitutional issue that the Federal Appeals Court does not have jurisdiction over a state constitution. States' Rights.

134 posted on 11/01/2004 5:50:06 PM PST by Ruth C (learn to analyze rationally and extrapolate consequences ... you might become a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Ruth C

The Federal Appeals Court was dealing with the Federal judge who tried to intervene in the States Business....


168 posted on 11/01/2004 6:30:10 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson