Posted on 11/01/2004 3:46:20 PM PST by stockpirate
Heck if it doesn't get to the Presidential race in time....maybe it will affect Kerry's Senate re-election in a few years!!!!
Much too late. Sorry won't help at this point
I agree - way too late - should have been out there on Drudge last Thursday. Coming out now will look like a dirty campaign trick and could backfire on Bush.
God did not part the Red Sea when Moses wanted it to happen! God parted the Red Sea in his time, not before and not afterwards, but right on time!
There's a huge difference between "Other Than Honorable" and "Dishonorable". Any info on exactly what it was?
Ping
You're late, you're late, for a very important date...Nov. 2nd.
The real tragedy is this story was buried all these months. We could end up with the most dishonorable president ever. But I don't think it will happen.
Middendorf will be in violation of the Privacy Act if he publicly states that Kerry was given a Dishonorable.
The best Middendorf can do is publicly vouch for the men who are trying to make this claim and ask for Kerry to sign the Form 180.
Well, SH*t let me just sit here and do nothing.
Or here is drudges email address
drudge@drudgereport.com
We can all send it to our address book if it is good to go.
I'm saying that this should have played in september. Swiftys have done a great job, but this should have piggy backed on their momentum. We havent heard that Kerry served in Vietnam in several weeks.
Yes!!!!!
Great work, but too late to help?
I hope that the people of the United States of America, the country that I know, will never elect such a Treasonous Traitor as President.
If they disappoint me, I guess we will just have to learn to deal with a TTPOTUS.
RamS
FR Contest: Write the Headline for Wednesday's Newspaper!!! (post number 235)
Way to go!!!!!................closer, closer, warmer, warmer, we're getting closer, very warm now, very warm, closer........GOOD WORK!!!!!!!!! Let's not quit till we're smokin'!!!!!!
Something wrong here. I seem to have read that officers don't get dishonorable discharges per se. They essentially get a hole in their record where the honorable discharge is supposed to be. This is part of why this has been so hard to nail down: explaining to the public that the absence of a document in 1975 means what it means, especially when K can point to a real discharge from 1978, is a hard sell.
Wouldn't it have been better for this to come out on Wednesday? /sarcasm
Quit being a quiter! Lets spread the fire!
God parted the Red Sea, now get moving!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.