A TO THE POINT HEADS-UP (John Kerry was dishonorably discharged from the military)

Swiftvets.com ^ | November 1, 2004 | Jack Wheeler

[stockpirate]

A TO THE POINT HEADS-UP

I had a conversation with Bill Middendorf earlier today. Bill was the Secretary of the Navy from April 1974 to January 1978. I got to know Bill well when he was Ronald Reagan\'s Ambassador to the OAS and we worked together on support for the Contras.

Bill has agreed to publicly state that to the best of his knowledge and recollection, John Kerry was dishonorably discharged from the military and fought to have this reversed while he (Bill)was SECNAV, which Bill of course refused to do. When Carter became president, Kerry secured the honorable discharge from Bill\'s successor.

The OTH (Other Than Honorable)discharge story has been out for a while, but for a former Secretary of the Navy to confirm it is major news. WorldNetDaily will be headlining it, as should the Washington Times tomorrow, and possibly Drudge. For some reason, Drudge, whom Jerry Corsi (coauthor of Unfit for Command) just talked to a few minutes! ago, is resisting. I also gave the story to Neal Cavuto at Fox.

I thought all TTPers should get a heads-up on this.

Jack Wheeler

[Bonaparte]

"I hope there is a documentable paper trail."

Legally? Only with kerry's signature on an SF 180. And he will never do that.

[ken21]

i beg to differ. when they deny others a forum, it's wrong.

we thought during the vietnam war that television was a "window on the world". little did we realize until later that they were manipulating the news for the purpose of turning america against the war.

[jwpjr]

re: "i beg to differ. when they deny others a forum, it's wrong"

Yes, they are wrong, but the question is whether it's within their rights. There's a difference between a 'right' and doing what's 'right'. Another way to put it would be that to do what's 'right' isn't always the 'right' thing to do. It's their paper/broadcast outlet. They have chosen to expend their resources to spread information around the world. It's their 'right' to spread information as they see fit. It may be the wrong thing to do, but it's their right. I know it's nit-picking point, but I think it's valid. But I certainly agree with you!

[ken21]

read ann coulter's treason, + get back 2 me.

[jwpjr]

re: "read ann coulter's treason, + get back 2 me"

I'll do that! I love her work and haven't read this one yet. I'm waiting for my wife to finish Ann's newest "How to Talk to a Liberal" and pass it on to me.

Thanks!