Posted on 10/30/2004 11:16:48 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative
Stories circulated today that the new OBL video was much less bipartisan than at first believed, and that unedited versions of the tape included threats against the Bush family and several Cabinet members.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
My stomach did a flip when I read your "concern about Monday and Tuesday" post.
We probably all intuitively knew it when we saw that grizzled evil man yesterday.
May God have mercy on us.
Good grief!
Actually, tens of thousands of us were in grave danger that morning, in lower Manhattan alone.
But you know what? By the time those planes were hijacked shortly after take-off, there wasn't a damn thing he could have done for any of us here that morning. It's not like if he had run here that any lives would have been saved.
Actually, that's almost directly (word for word) from Michael Moore-on's movie.
Why would they do that? Their intention was to slaughter as many innocents as possible, in as gruesome and horrific a manner as possible.
If this is true we should have heard the unedited version.
And they'll leave us alone until the next time they decide we aren't doing what they want, and they begin it all again, requiring us to back down yet again. The pathway of appeasement leads only to appeasement, the only victory is resounding success against them.
I expect him to start using pull quotes from UBL on the DVD cover.
She needs to put her back back up her ass -- and not take it out again until Wednesday morning.
"Media also leaving out all the blame for our situation on America's support for Israel."
Informed sources saying the same thing in Washington.
Thanks for the welcome. My son threatened to toss his LIVESTRONG wristband in the garbage when he saw Lurch sporting one.
Whoahh! I'm late in reading the transcript, but yesterday when I heard "Manhattan" quoted, it seemed extremely odd. Who uses the term "Manhattan" in reference to 911? I know it's technically correct, but the normal name for the attacks is 911, spoken as "nine eleven". Did Osama choose his words as intentionally as he did the timing of his appearance? What does he really mean when he says "Manhattan"?
A "Manhattan Project"?
We want to restore freedom to our Nation and just as you lay waste to our Nation so shall we lay waste to yours.
And why mention Sweden? Code for travel plans? That is, if you Google Manhattan Project + Sweden, you'll see that Niels Bohr had an interesting itinerary:
"In 1943 rejected an offer to work on the German atomic bomb and escaped to Sweden and then London eventually ending up in the United States to work on the Manhattan project. He was considered by many of his fellow scientists to be the sage of the Manhattan project.
http://nhs.needham.k12.ma.us/cur/mp/whos_who.html
Sweden - London - US - Manhattan Project
Hmmm. Maybe I'm just over-imaginative, but considering the above, the first line of Osama's rant takes on an ominous tone.
To begin: Peace be upon he who follow the Guidance.
It looks like he was giving directions.
Sorry if this is a repeat of what others may have posted.
Actually, I think the MSM screwed up here, because that language is basically Osama saying, "Dump the cowboy and we'll leave you alone," and how can it be good for Kerry to get a tacit endorsement from a guy he claims he's going to go kill?
And if it's true, and I were President, I'd bomb (or sic Green Berets and SEALs on) every Al-Jazeera office outside Qatar. If the tape is old, what Al-Jazeera did is an act of war.
Guess OBL also has Barney the dog in his sights.
Is barney still alive ? Never see him anymore.
Thank you for correcting me. I should have re-read the article before I posted. I thought I had read one minute was broadcat out of a five minute tape, but I was mistaken. Thirteen minutes is a lot of missing material!
Barney is alive ,,saw his pic the other day.
Wow, we have Michael Moore's screenwriter, OBL. But why would OBL make "threats" against Bush's family? Michael Moore has assured us that Bush helped OBL's family get out of the country after 9/11.
You have that right. This IS the pre-election terror attack, meaning Bush has done a great job preventing attacks and keeping them in disarray. Unfortunately, for the weak minded, the lack of attacks is proof we do not need to fight the war on terror.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.