To: GeorgeBerryman
The point is that of all the comments that can be made about this article, such as what was Saddam giving Bin Laden in return for this (WMD, maybe?), and many others, most people, including you, choose to comment on the look of the pearl, which is basically irrelevant.
62 posted on
10/28/2004 11:26:21 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(GET OUT THE VOTE. ENSURE A BUSH/CHENEY WIN.)
To: FairOpinion
Yeesh, sorry for breathing. I read the article - having read Stephen Hayes'
The Connection the article doesn't come as a shock to me. That's probably why I didn't go into detail about it. And the picture of the damn thing just looked freakishly odd.
I'll just exit the thread now.
To: FairOpinion
The point is that of all the comments that can be made about this article, such as what was Saddam giving Bin Laden in return for this (WMD, maybe?), and many others, most people, including you, choose to comment on the look of the pearl, which is basically irrelevant. Well excuuuuse us. When is it ok to have a discussion about the look of the pearl? Shall we create a new thread in Chat? What's irrelevant is you dictating to others what can and can't be discussed on FR. No offense, as you are a vet here, but cmon, lighten up.
90 posted on
10/29/2004 5:22:13 AM PDT by
smith288
(Teresa Heinz thinks stay at home moms aren't "real" workers. Tell my wife that.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson