Is that how credible you can get?
| 8 | “Libertarians are the enemy now?” |
What do you mean "now"?
--Boot Hill
| 8 | “Earlier this year Shaw was reportedly involved in a controversy involving the former Iraqi golden boy and now criminal, Ahmed Chalabi. The scandal involved the awarding of cell phone contracts to three companies with close ties to Chalibi. According to the L.A. Times, he was put under investigation by the FBI.” (Originally posted by Destro in #51 as a "news article", where he failed to disclose that the actual source was the Libertarian Party national office.) |
You see, this is how slimy your Libertarian source gets.
Yeah, Shaw was "involved in the controversy", because he was the one that uncovered, disclosed and thwarted the controversy, which "involved the awarding of cell phone contracts to three companies with close ties to Chalibi".
Just as Jack Shaw was at the forefront in the uncovering of the Israeli spy network operating inside DOD this year and working closely with the FBI in prosecuting that case, so to was he DOD's point man in the case you so falsely presented here. And for this reason, Rumsfeld and DOD stand foursquare behind Jack Shaw.
But the one good thing your fraudulent post and responses did here, was to confirm that you are knowingly acting as the Libertarian Party's point man for spreading those despicable lies here on FR and intentionally undermining Bush's leadership in the GWOT.
"Libertarians are the enemy now", you ask? Hell yes they are!
--Boot Hill