To: Destro
A Bill Gertz article is 'suspect' because of a hit piece from the LA Times on one of the sources?
That's like saying Jerome Corsi is discredited as an author because of comments he made on Free Republic...
86 posted on
10/28/2004 10:54:21 AM PDT by
DaveMSmith
(I'm not so sure it's credible to quote leading news organizations about --oh,nevermind.-GWB)
To: DaveMSmith
Bill Gertz just did his job as a reporter. Gertz investigated nothing but rather reported the speculation of Shaw - a man under FBI investigation - and Shaw based his speculation on hearsay evidence.
Gertz is not suspect but Shaw is.
Back to you.
90 posted on
10/28/2004 11:00:56 AM PDT by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: DaveMSmith
PS: Where Gertz failed in his job is to not mention that his source was under investigation by the FBI and to he failed to get a second corroboration.
94 posted on
10/28/2004 11:07:47 AM PDT by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson